Roles you'd actually get. With reasons attached.
Upload your CV. We surface the roles you'd realistically hear back from with one clear reason for each, and what's missing in your profile. Then we draft the application in your voice. You send.
No match scores.
We don't show you 87%. We show you the one reason this role fits, and what to address before you apply.
Drafts in your voice.
Applications written from your CV, in your tone. You edit. You send. Nothing goes out behind your back.
A reason on every miss.
When a role isn't a fit, you see exactly what's missing. So the next application is sharper, not louder.
Reviews that say exactly what to fix.
Submit a CV, portfolio, or case study. Get back three things: what's wrong, what to change, and one task to ship this week. Instant from AI. Or from a senior product person in 72 hours.
•Your headline is a job title, not a position. It tells a hiring manager nothing about what you'd be hired for.
•Three of four roles read as responsibilities. Paystack is the exception that's the bar the others need to hit.
•Twelve tools listed. Zero proof. Cut to six, or move the rest into the roles where you used them.
•Rewrite the headline as positioning. Specific enough to place you in four seconds.
•Quantify three more outcomes. Not everywhere where the result is the reason you'd be hired.
•Cut the skills list to six. The rest go in case studies, not a roll call.
Rewrite the top third of your CV. New positioning headline. Two bullets that lead with outcome before responsibility. Resubmit when done.
Instant
AI review against the same checklist a senior would run. Catches what's costing you replies.
Expert
A vetted senior reads your work. Same format. With the pattern recognition only hiring teaches you.
Every review ends with one task to rework, resubmit, and we'll score what changed.